Saturday, June 2, 2012

The Millenials: Good or Bad?

After watching the video of the "debate" as to whether the new generation is smart or dumb, I find myself leaning more towards Neil Howe and his stand of this generation being the next great generation. When I initially began to watch the debate, I thought Bauerlein may have some really good points as to how the media and technology has been hindering students throughout their schooling, but because his focus was only on intellectual habits and their decline, I did not feel he had a strong argument. Bauerlein focused mainly on how intellectual skills, specifically reading, have declined vastly in spite of the great advantages and opportunities to acquire knowledge and skills in schooling. Although he makes a good point that this is happening because the digital age has kids self-absorbed in their social networking, he fails to mention how many social medias are being used in the classroom in order to engage students and complete assignments. Many classes now use facebook as a discussion board site and blogs are being used to share opinions in classes as well as for teachers to communicate with parents and students outside of the classroom. I can see how students do become self-absorbed with social media but a majority of students do know how to limit themselves and get their work completed before indulging in the luxuries of tweeting or posting a new status. 

I thought Howe's argument was very well structured and focused on more than one area of a child's life and how technology has shown positive benefits for students. He brought up excellent points specifically in behavior and discussing how students have seen decreases in violence and drugs and increases in civic responsibilities as well as the closing value gap with parents. I also liked how he took the four common myths about technology and kids and completely busted them. He made great points to the fact that although students are not leisurely reading as much it is because they have to read for school and as many students know, that takes away any time for reading outside of the classroom, as well as how video games are being used to train people in the military. Overall, I thought Howe's powerpoint presentation and display of statistics blew Bauerlein out of the water and was a fair representation of how our generation is the next generation and will be able to reap the benefits from technology as well as help to enhance different jobs and areas of life where technology can be used positively.

10 comments:

  1. Blaise your points about Howe and how he viewed technology as a positive thing was great. I strongly agree that is the direction society is moving towards and it only makes sense to compare students based off of what they are surrounded by. The lack of reading worries me but there has to be a way to meet in the middle with reading and technology.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I felt the same way about Howe. The structure of his argument and presentation easily created a solid point and a strong connection with his stance. I agree that technology has become such a useful tool that we should embrace this tool instead of pointing out all the negatives.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I felt the same way about Bauerlein. He opened his argument by saying that there are some great aspects about this generation, including less violent crime and drug use, but, intellectually, they are on the decline. I think achievement does not rest solely on intelligence. People can be intelligent in different ways. For Millennials, the fact that they are so technologically savvy is a sign of intelligence.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree that information is delivered in a multitude of ways now (online games, programs, blogs, social media, video, audio, newspapers, books, etc.) and our students need to know how to process and make sense out of all of them.

    I also think that the so called "lack of reading for pleasure" is a bit misleading in a way that our definition of reading for pleasure might be very different from school-aged children we teach.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I, too, liked that Howe went deeper with his argument than simply focusing on intellectual habits. For instance, more and more Millenials that I know are moving back home to live with their parents, be it to save money on rent while they finish advanced degrees, because of downsizing at work and a lack of available jobs, or simply to help their parents care for their home. They don't mind, and their parents don't mind, because they get along so well. I would agree that the value gap is closing, and that truly makes us unique. How many other generations can claim that?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I thought they both spoke strongly for their point of view, but I couldn't fully agree with either. They chose to look at two different viewpoints; one being academic, and the other being social. Finding a positive balance between the two would be ideal.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I’m not sure if the “majority of students know how to limit themselves and get their work completed before indulging in the luxuries of tweeting or posting a new status.” That may be true for most adults, but I’m not sure that I would say that the majority of my high school students are that time conscious. I hope they are, but have seen evidence to the contrary. Of course I haven’t done a formal study or survey. ;) I do believe it’s something that needs to be discussed in class if it’s not discussed at home.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I thought Howe did come off better and Bauerlein came of as kind of the cranky guy who wished kids read more of the classics so they know their history. I guess that would work (and did) for a long time when things were more vertical in terms of technology and leadership and learning. Now that things seem to be "flattened" and more horizontal, like comes out in this debate and the famous Friedman book, I wonder how people will function.

    We have already seen some push-back from the 99%ers who do not agree with certain socio-economic hierarchies, but those 1%ers sure do not want to give up what they have either. Also, media seems to be more 1% driven in some ways (TV, news, media outlets) but not in others (Twitter, Facebook to some degree). School, wiht all the talk of standards and basics, seems to still be on that hierarchical structure.

    How do we figure out to sort all these messages and teach students to deal in this world?
    Those are my big questions for this class.

    We live in interesting times...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Blaise,

    I completely agree. I think Howe did a great job of explaining how the technology of today should be seen as a tool and a means for students to progress. I would agree that this technology has taken the focus off of print and pleasure reading; however, I think it can still have a place if presented in the correct manner by us... There is no reason to keep students from using such great forms of technology, we just need to teach them how to use them appropriately.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think that Bauerlein's point was that students today are immersed in technology, but the way that they are participating with the technology is not knowledge inducing. I see this all the time in the classroom. My students did not know how to use a search engine. I had to teach these skills. I don't think that students are being taught well enough how to use technology to dive deeper into a subject. Far too often students are placed on a computer and simply told to go research a topic. Because students today are so tech savvy, teachers become guilty of assumicide. We assume that they know how to use computers for projects in school, but searching at home and searching at school do not look the same.

    ReplyDelete